Making a difference to the people we help treat by creating value and improving healthcare outcomes through connecting innovative manufacturers with Australasian customers.

Thermo Fisher – Mould Allergy Testing

Allergy to mould and successful AIT | Discover the connection

ImmunoCAP® Allergen Components help you identify appropriate allergens for improved AIT outcomes.

Extract-based testing can be insufficient for diagnosis of mould sensitisation

• Standardisation of testing extracts is difficult.1-3
• Sensitivity of SPT + slgE is less than 80%.4

A component test with Alt a 1 (Alternaria) alone has a sensitivity of 80%.5

“Precise diagnosis of fungal allergy is the basis for immunotherapy.” 6


Mould sensitisation correlates with asthma risk and severity

In a UK study 66% of adult asthma patients were found to be sensitised to mould.7

  • Aspergillus 45%, Candida 36%, Penicillium 29%, Cladosporium 24%, Alternaria 22%, Botrytis 18%.

In US studies, a correlation between fungal exposure and asthma severity in sensitised children was shown: 8,9

  • Increased asthma symptoms.
  • Increased exacerbation risk.

ImmunoCAP can help you improve AIT outcome

  • AIT success is more likely if sensitisation to specific components is identified.10-12
  • Poly-sensitisation makes differentiation between specific and cross-reactive components a challenge. 10, 13, 14
  • ImmunoCAP Complete Allergens identify the allergen sources the patient is sensitised to, i.e. help rule in/out allergy. 15-17
  • ImmunoCAP Allergen Components differentiate between specific and cross-reactive sensitisation. 10-12

View the Thermo Fisher Mould ImmunoCAP Allergen Components brochure

Download >

References:

  1. Aden E, et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999;104(1)128-35.
  2. Vailes L, et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001;107(4):641-6.
  3. Esch E. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;113(2):210-5.
  4. Kay B, et al. Allergy and allergic diseases. Vol 2. Blackwell Publishing 2008.
  5. De Vouge MW, et al. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 1996;111(4):385-95.
  6. Twaroch TE, et al. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2015;7(3):205-20.
  7. O’Driscoll BR, et al. Clin Exp Allergy. 2009;39(11):1677-83.
  8. Pongracic JA, et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;125(3):593-9.
  9. Gent JF, et al. Environ Res. 2012;118:86-93.
  10. Canonica GW, et al. World Allergy Organization Journal 2013;6(1):17.
  11. Asero R. Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;44(5):183-7.
  12. Schmid-Grendelmeier P. Hautarzt 2010;61(11):946-53.
  13. Ciprandi G, et al. Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;40(3):77-83.
  14. Petersson CJ, et al. Sensitization profile in undiagnosed children with skin and respiratory allergy-like symptoms in primary care. Abstract presented at WAO, Buenos Aires, Argentina 6-10 December 2009.
  15. Söderström L, et al. Allergy. 2003;58:921-8.
  16. Sampson HA. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001;107:891-6.
  17. Duran-Tauleria E, et al. Allergy. 2004;59(Suppl 78):35-41.

THESE PRODUCTS ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR PURCHASE BY THE GENERAL PUBLIC.



Request a Quote

Request Quote

Recent Posts

Immuno Concepts: PSITS Program 2026

The Immuno Concepts Patient Sample Interpretative Training Series (PSITS) is a program designed as a teaching and training tool for laboratory staff to enhance their knowledge in…

Read full article

Thermo Fisher – Phadia Quality Controls Guide

Why Quality Controls Matter in Allergy and Autoimmune Diagnostics In clinical laboratories, the accuracy of diagnostic results is of utmost importance, particularly when managing complex…

Read full article

Thermo Fisher – Spring Allergy Range

Setting the Standard in Allergy Diagnostics In the evolving landscape of allergy diagnostics, precision and reliability are paramount. Thermo Fisher Scientific’s ImmunoCAP™ product range stands…

Read full article